July 30, 2010
The EEOC announced efforts to prevent discrimination in a Southern California Korean American community. Understand the challenges anti-discrimination laws present for different cultures. Read more...
Employers and employees are continually experimenting with flexibility in the workplace. Know some of the benefits and risks associated with this prized benefit. Read more...
A federal court rules in favor of an employer because the employee failed to prove a material adverse employment action. Know what conduct rises to the level of an adverse employment action for Title VII claims. Read more...
A new study shows that more men are looking for alternatives to the traditional 40-hour workweek. Know some of the federal laws that protect working fathers. Read more...
Recent News
Try Training to Reduce Turnover
Turnover is costly. Learn why training can lower turnover in your organization. Read More
The EEOC is 45 Years Old...What Has It Done and What Should It Do?
The EEOC first opened its doors in 1965. Learn what the Commission has accomplished over the last 45 years. We ask you whether the EEOC should do more to help employers prevent litigation. Read More
Medical Breakthroughs and GINA Liability
A recent study announced a breakthrough medical test for detecting Alzheimer's disease. While a breakthrough for patients and doctors, such tests create risk for employers. Read More
Recent Articles
Are Anti-Bullying Laws Necessary?
Some states are proposing anti-bullying statutes for employment. Opponents say we don't need the laws. What does it mean for employers? Read More
Settle or Fight All the Way to Trial...the Odds
A new study shows that half of all discrimination cases settle early. Jack McCalmon explains why the study may not help employers understand the risk they face today and provides insight on the best practice when hit with an employment practices claim. Read More
Supreme Court Weighs in on Sexting and the Right of Privacy for Some Employees
The Supreme Court has ruled on a lawsuit concerning a government employee's right to privacy when using employer-owned equipment for personal purposes. What implications does this decision have for employers? Read More